Monday, November 7, 2011

Visit TestAmerica at the NEBC's 15th Annual Business & the Environment Conference

November 8-9, 2011
Portland, Oregon
www.businessandenvironment.org

TestAmerica is the leading environmental testing firm, providing comprehensive analytical testing, including analyses for sediments, drinking water, PCB, and dioxin/furan. TestAmerica companies provide services in indoor air, air emissions, and remediation products.

Stop by Booth # 45 to learn more about:
  • TestAmerica's DoD ELAP Accreditation
  • Northwest and Alaska TPH methods (VPH and EPH)
  • Sediment testing and supported programs
  • Specialty analytical techniques for the Pacific Northwest Region

  • Call for more information on TestAmerica's technical expertise and capabilities:
    Portland Laboratory
    (503) 906-9200

    Seattle Laboratory
    (253) 922-2310

    Spokane Laboratory
    (509) 924-9200

    Wednesday, November 2, 2011

    Ask The Expert: Indoor Mold Issues

    Ask the Expert Question (1 of 3):
    Does a wall area of 2'x2' of Stachybotrys or Aspergillus need to be contained?

    TestAmerica Expert: Ariunaa Jalsrai


    Expert's Response:
    Indoor growth of Aspergillus, Stachybotrys, and other indicator fungi of water damaged environments warrants a risk assessment, which usually requires future investigation. Mold exposure does not always present a health problem indoors. However, some people are sensitive to molds. These people may experience symptoms such as nasal congestion, eye irritation, wheezing, or skin irritation when exposed to molds. Severe reactions may include fever and shortness of breath. Immunocompromised persons and persons with chronic lung diseases are at increased risk for opportunistic infections and may develop fungal infections in their lungs.

    I am not an industrial hygienist; however, I would recommend removing the mold growth from the wall.

    Question # 2 of 3:
    The indoor air has 5 times more mold (Aspergillus) than the outdoors. Is this normal or anything to worry about?

    Expert's Response:
    Molds are very common in buildings and homes and will grow anywhere indoors where there is moisture. The most common indoor molds are Cladosporium, Penicillium and Aspergillus. In the indoor environment, Aspergillus can be found in household dust, building materials, ornamental plants, flower arrangements, tobacco, food and water. Some Aspergillus species can cause adverse health effects.

    Approximately 20 species of Aspergillus have been reported as causative agents of opportunistic infections in humans. Aspergillus fumigatus is the most important opportunist and is commonly encountered in hospitals as well as other environments. Other species, such as A. flavus, A. terreus, A. niger, and A. nidulans, can also cause human infections. I would recommend performing speciation of Aspergillus.

    Question # 3 of 3:
    Should we mix the bleach a little stronger, say 1 part bleach to 5 parts of water or would the standard of 1 part bleach to 10 parts water be OK?

    Expert's Response:
    I am not a professional hygienist, so I could not answer this question, but The CDC provides excellent on-line resources: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/stachy.htm.

    For example, mold growth can be removed from hard surfaces with commercial products, soap and water, or a bleach solution of no more than 1 cup of bleach in 1 gallon of water.

    Thursday, October 20, 2011

    Thermite Reaction from a Plane Crash

    Ask the Expert Question:
    Could the friction from a plane crash generate enough energy to start a thermite reaction?

    TestAmerica Expert: Larry Penfold


    Expert's Response:
    Thermite reactions are chemical reactions between a zero valence metal and a metal oxide. The one I remember from my school days involved iron oxide (rust) and powdered aluminum, which requires an ignition source with a temperature of something like 2,500 to 3,000 degrees Centigrade. The reaction generates a lot of heat quickly and, unlike a paper fire, doesn’t need any air to keep it going. The oxygen that sustains the burning is coming from the iron oxide. It’s a chemistry experiment that requires extra fire precautions - I can remember a demonstration given by one of my university chemistry professors that was much more exciting than he expected.

    In regards to a plane crash, the total energy of an airplane crash is certainly more than enough to start a thermite reaction. A little Fourth of July sparkler is enough if all of the ingredients are carefully prepared in the right proportions, and it is the question about the right proportions that is the key to the answer to your question.

    I would guess that the aluminum skin in the nose of the crashing airplane could simply melt and burn in the atmosphere without any metal oxide being present. In other words, a spray of high temperature aluminum combining rapidly with the oxygen in the air is a likely reaction. Spontaneous combustion of materials in air is sometimes called a pyrophoric reaction, not quite the same as a thermite reaction. If there were some iron rust present where the aluminum from the nose of the plane is burning, then it could add its oxygen to the burning and there would be a little bit of a thermite reaction going on. But unless there almost as much rust as aluminum, I wouldn’t think that would be the main effect because the ratio of the ingredients, the stoichiometry, is not right.

    View Larry Penfold's expert profile

    Thursday, September 29, 2011

    EPA Releases Final Health Assessment for TCE

    WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released the final health assessment for trichloroethylene (TCE) to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database.  IRIS is a human health assessment program that evaluates the latest science on chemicals in our environment. The final assessment characterizes the chemical as carcinogenic to humans and as a human noncancer health hazard. This assessment will also allow for a better understanding of the risks posed to communities from exposure to TCE in soil, water and air. It will provide federal, state, local and other policy makers with the latest scientific information to make decisions about cleanup and other actions to protect people's health. 

    "This assessment is an important first step, providing valuable information to the state, local and federal agencies responsible for protecting the health of the American people," said Paul Anastas, assistant administrator for the EPA's Office of Research and Development. "It underscores the importance of EPA's science and, in particular, the critical value of the IRIS database for ensuring that government officials and the American people have the information they need to protect their health and the health of their children."

    TCE is one of the most common man-made chemicals found in the environment. It is a volatile chemical and a widely used chlorinated solvent. Frequently found at Superfund sites across the country, TCE’s movement from contaminated ground water and soil, into the indoor air of overlying buildings, is of serious concern. EPA already has drinking water standards for TCE and standards for cleaning up TCE at Superfund sites throughout the country.

    TCE toxicity values as reported in the assessment will be considered in:

    ·         Establishing cleanup methods at the 761 Superfund sites where TCE has been identified as a contaminant
    ·         Understanding the risk from vapor intrusion as TCE vapors move from contaminated groundwater and soil into the indoor air of overlying buildings
    ·         Revising EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Level for TCE as part of the carcinogenic volatile organic compounds group in drinking water, as described in the agency’s drinking water strategy
    ·         Developing appropriate regulatory standards limiting the atmospheric emissions of TCE – a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act

    This assessment has undergone several levels of peer review including, agency review, interagency review, public comment, external peer review by EPA’s Science Advisory Board in January 2011, and a scientific consultation review in 2006 by the National Academy of Sciences. Comments from all reviewers are addressed in the final assessment.

    EPA continues to strengthen IRIS as part of an ongoing effort to ensure concrete research and science are used to protect human health and the environment. In May 2009, EPA restructured the IRIS program to reinforce independent review and ensure the timely publication of assessments. In July 2011, EPA announced further changes to strengthen the IRIS program in response to recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences. EPA’s peer review process is designed to elicit the strongest possible critique to ensure that each final IRIS assessment reflects sound, rigorous science.

    More information on IRIS: http://www.epa.gov/IRIS

    Monday, August 29, 2011

    Exposure Assessment Planning

    Ask the Expert Webinar Series
    September 15, 2011
    1:30 P.M. EST

    Exposure assessments are conducted for a variety of reasons. The design of the strategy should be consistent with the underlying purpose of the assessment and how the resulting data will be used. Collecting samples without fully understanding how the results will be utilized and communicated can result in obtaining information that maybe misinterpreted or misleading. Prior to collecting field samples, it is necessary to clearly understand the purpose and objectives of sampling projects.

    The purpose of the data collection, in conjunction with the availability and cost of field and laboratory analytic techniques, as well as the time sensitivity of the results, will determine the overall sampling strategy. This presentation provides a basic overview of the planning elements that are important to conducting a productive, cost effective and successful exposure assessment.


    Register Now for the presentation
    

    Thursday, August 18, 2011

    Visit TestAmerica at the 2011 SAME Missouri River/ TEXOMA Regional Conference

    August 23-25, 2011
    Downtown Marriott
    Kansas City, MO
    TestAmerica has more than 20 years of technical and industry experience with the analysis of trace explosives and compounds unique to the military, supporting hundreds of special projects under various programs domestically and internationally.
    TestAmerica provides analytical testing to assist with clean-up activities for a variety of clients, regulatory officials, and stakeholders from every segment of the Department of Defense, and is the nation’s:
    • Only network with 13 DoD QSM Compliant laboratories
    • First laboratory to receive USACE approval for Method 8330B in support of MRP
    • First laboratory to be DoD ELAP accredited
    • Leader in developing applications of Incremental Sampling Methodology (ISM) to an expanding range of chemicals of interest to the DoD.
    Stop by Booth # 105 to learn more about TestAmerica’s:
    • DoD ELAP accredited laboratories
    • ISM expertise and capabilities - 8330B and beyond
    • Methods for conventional explosives and the new insensitive munitions constituents
    Sign up now for our free webinar on Insensitive Munitions Constituents on Thursday, August 25th at 1:30 P.M. EST.

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011

    Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products Challenges in Non-Conventional Matrices

    Ask the Expert Webinar Series
    August 18, 2011
    1:30 P.M. EST


    Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) represent a large subset of contaminants of emerging concern labeled as endocrine disruptors. The endocrine system is a balanced network of glands and hormones that regulates developmental activities such as growth, behavior, metabolism, intelligence, sexual development, and the ability to reproduce as well as many other functions. To date, many studies have characterized the PPCP contamination in rivers and lakes across the country, and as the effects of these contaminates are unfolding, researchers are looking beyond water ways for these chemicals.

    TestAmerica continues to partner with public and private researchers looking for PPCPs as they pass from non-point sources into sensitive ecosystems. Our method development has expanded our PPCP testing capabilities into sediment and tissue samples to find these contaminants where endocrine disruption is occurring. Making the leap from testing water to more complex matrices requires solutions for increased matrix related interferences and extraction enhancements that effectively remove the target compounds from the sample. Our success with complex matrices is helping answer difficult questions where PPCP contamination may be lurking.


    Register Now for the presentation