Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Ask The Expert: Heterotrophic Plate Count Analysis

Ask the Expert Question:
What is the purpose of the Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC) analysis and is it a replacement for Total Coliform analysis? What are the action limits for the HPC analysis?

TestAmerica Expert: Alex Spears


Expert's Response:
The purpose of the HPC (heterotrophic plate count) test is to determine the total heterotrophic (environmental) bacteria load present in the water sample, and is not used in lieu of the total coliform test, as the total (and fecal) coliform tests are used in determining the possible presence of pathogens in the water. The EPA action limit for potable (drinking) water is 500 cfu/mL. More information about the EPA guidelines and action limits can be found at http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm#3.


Friday, November 11, 2011

TestAmerica Indianapolis is the Latest Addition to Midwest Facilities

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. announces the opening of a new location, TestAmerica Indianapolis, which will facilitate organizing on-time sample delivery and local access to TestAmerica’s regional laboratories in Valparaiso, IN, Chicago, IL, Dayton, OH, as well as its nationwide network of laboratories for specialty analyses including air, dioxins, sediments and a vast array of analytical capabilities.

TestAmerica Indianapolis offers clients support for sample bottle pick-up and delivery in the Metro Indianapolis area. The staff will coordinate the shipping of samples within TestAmerica’s network of specialty laboratories to meet any client’s analytical needs.

Ms. Melissa Hamer-Bailey has assumed the role as the TestAmerica Indianapolis Manager. Ms. Hamer-Bailey has extensive experience in the environmental testing industry, serving as a professional environmental consultant, Board Member to the Indiana Alliance of Hazardous Materials Professionals, and Senior Environmental Manager at the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), in her previous roles. Ms. Hamer-Bailey has developed applied expertise in the areas of quality assurance, sampling and analysis plan development, risk assessment and management.

TestAmerica is excited to expand our service and support to the Indianapolis area to provide both new and existing clients more convenient access to our network of analytical offerings. We are also pleased to have Ms. Hamer-Bailey join our team. She brings to TestAmerica her expertise in both the regulatory and consulting aspects of our industry to assist our clients in their project needs,” states TestAmerica’s General Manager of Midwest Operations, Rusty Vicinie.

For additional information on the services available, please contact TestAmerica Indianapolis at (317) 264-9686.

About TestAmerica
TestAmerica is the leading environmental testing firm in the United States, with over 90 locations providing innovative technical expertise and comprehensive analytical testing services. Specialty analyses include source, ambient and indoor air, water quality and aquatic toxicity, compliance, desalination, shale gas, specialty organics, emergency response, industrial hygiene, dioxins, drinking water, sediments and tissues, PPCPs and emerging contaminants, explosives, Federal/DoD, and radiochemistry and mixed waste testing.

TestAmerica affiliate companies include EMLab P&K, the leader in analytical microscopy and indoor air quality; QED Environmental Systems, Inc., the leading supplier of groundwater sampling equipment and remediation pumping systems; and TestAmerica Air Emissions Corp. (METCO Environmental), specializing in air emissions testing. TestAmerica currently employs nearly 2,800 professionals dedicated to exceptional service and solutions for our clients’ environmental testing needs.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Visit TestAmerica at the NEBC's 15th Annual Business & the Environment Conference

November 8-9, 2011
Portland, Oregon
www.businessandenvironment.org

TestAmerica is the leading environmental testing firm, providing comprehensive analytical testing, including analyses for sediments, drinking water, PCB, and dioxin/furan. TestAmerica companies provide services in indoor air, air emissions, and remediation products.

Stop by Booth # 45 to learn more about:
  • TestAmerica's DoD ELAP Accreditation
  • Northwest and Alaska TPH methods (VPH and EPH)
  • Sediment testing and supported programs
  • Specialty analytical techniques for the Pacific Northwest Region

  • Call for more information on TestAmerica's technical expertise and capabilities:
    Portland Laboratory
    (503) 906-9200

    Seattle Laboratory
    (253) 922-2310

    Spokane Laboratory
    (509) 924-9200

    Wednesday, November 2, 2011

    Ask The Expert: Indoor Mold Issues

    Ask the Expert Question (1 of 3):
    Does a wall area of 2'x2' of Stachybotrys or Aspergillus need to be contained?

    TestAmerica Expert: Ariunaa Jalsrai


    Expert's Response:
    Indoor growth of Aspergillus, Stachybotrys, and other indicator fungi of water damaged environments warrants a risk assessment, which usually requires future investigation. Mold exposure does not always present a health problem indoors. However, some people are sensitive to molds. These people may experience symptoms such as nasal congestion, eye irritation, wheezing, or skin irritation when exposed to molds. Severe reactions may include fever and shortness of breath. Immunocompromised persons and persons with chronic lung diseases are at increased risk for opportunistic infections and may develop fungal infections in their lungs.

    I am not an industrial hygienist; however, I would recommend removing the mold growth from the wall.

    Question # 2 of 3:
    The indoor air has 5 times more mold (Aspergillus) than the outdoors. Is this normal or anything to worry about?

    Expert's Response:
    Molds are very common in buildings and homes and will grow anywhere indoors where there is moisture. The most common indoor molds are Cladosporium, Penicillium and Aspergillus. In the indoor environment, Aspergillus can be found in household dust, building materials, ornamental plants, flower arrangements, tobacco, food and water. Some Aspergillus species can cause adverse health effects.

    Approximately 20 species of Aspergillus have been reported as causative agents of opportunistic infections in humans. Aspergillus fumigatus is the most important opportunist and is commonly encountered in hospitals as well as other environments. Other species, such as A. flavus, A. terreus, A. niger, and A. nidulans, can also cause human infections. I would recommend performing speciation of Aspergillus.

    Question # 3 of 3:
    Should we mix the bleach a little stronger, say 1 part bleach to 5 parts of water or would the standard of 1 part bleach to 10 parts water be OK?

    Expert's Response:
    I am not a professional hygienist, so I could not answer this question, but The CDC provides excellent on-line resources: http://www.cdc.gov/mold/stachy.htm.

    For example, mold growth can be removed from hard surfaces with commercial products, soap and water, or a bleach solution of no more than 1 cup of bleach in 1 gallon of water.

    Thursday, October 20, 2011

    Thermite Reaction from a Plane Crash

    Ask the Expert Question:
    Could the friction from a plane crash generate enough energy to start a thermite reaction?

    TestAmerica Expert: Larry Penfold


    Expert's Response:
    Thermite reactions are chemical reactions between a zero valence metal and a metal oxide. The one I remember from my school days involved iron oxide (rust) and powdered aluminum, which requires an ignition source with a temperature of something like 2,500 to 3,000 degrees Centigrade. The reaction generates a lot of heat quickly and, unlike a paper fire, doesn’t need any air to keep it going. The oxygen that sustains the burning is coming from the iron oxide. It’s a chemistry experiment that requires extra fire precautions - I can remember a demonstration given by one of my university chemistry professors that was much more exciting than he expected.

    In regards to a plane crash, the total energy of an airplane crash is certainly more than enough to start a thermite reaction. A little Fourth of July sparkler is enough if all of the ingredients are carefully prepared in the right proportions, and it is the question about the right proportions that is the key to the answer to your question.

    I would guess that the aluminum skin in the nose of the crashing airplane could simply melt and burn in the atmosphere without any metal oxide being present. In other words, a spray of high temperature aluminum combining rapidly with the oxygen in the air is a likely reaction. Spontaneous combustion of materials in air is sometimes called a pyrophoric reaction, not quite the same as a thermite reaction. If there were some iron rust present where the aluminum from the nose of the plane is burning, then it could add its oxygen to the burning and there would be a little bit of a thermite reaction going on. But unless there almost as much rust as aluminum, I wouldn’t think that would be the main effect because the ratio of the ingredients, the stoichiometry, is not right.

    View Larry Penfold's expert profile

    Thursday, September 29, 2011

    EPA Releases Final Health Assessment for TCE

    WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released the final health assessment for trichloroethylene (TCE) to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database.  IRIS is a human health assessment program that evaluates the latest science on chemicals in our environment. The final assessment characterizes the chemical as carcinogenic to humans and as a human noncancer health hazard. This assessment will also allow for a better understanding of the risks posed to communities from exposure to TCE in soil, water and air. It will provide federal, state, local and other policy makers with the latest scientific information to make decisions about cleanup and other actions to protect people's health. 

    "This assessment is an important first step, providing valuable information to the state, local and federal agencies responsible for protecting the health of the American people," said Paul Anastas, assistant administrator for the EPA's Office of Research and Development. "It underscores the importance of EPA's science and, in particular, the critical value of the IRIS database for ensuring that government officials and the American people have the information they need to protect their health and the health of their children."

    TCE is one of the most common man-made chemicals found in the environment. It is a volatile chemical and a widely used chlorinated solvent. Frequently found at Superfund sites across the country, TCE’s movement from contaminated ground water and soil, into the indoor air of overlying buildings, is of serious concern. EPA already has drinking water standards for TCE and standards for cleaning up TCE at Superfund sites throughout the country.

    TCE toxicity values as reported in the assessment will be considered in:

    ·         Establishing cleanup methods at the 761 Superfund sites where TCE has been identified as a contaminant
    ·         Understanding the risk from vapor intrusion as TCE vapors move from contaminated groundwater and soil into the indoor air of overlying buildings
    ·         Revising EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Level for TCE as part of the carcinogenic volatile organic compounds group in drinking water, as described in the agency’s drinking water strategy
    ·         Developing appropriate regulatory standards limiting the atmospheric emissions of TCE – a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act

    This assessment has undergone several levels of peer review including, agency review, interagency review, public comment, external peer review by EPA’s Science Advisory Board in January 2011, and a scientific consultation review in 2006 by the National Academy of Sciences. Comments from all reviewers are addressed in the final assessment.

    EPA continues to strengthen IRIS as part of an ongoing effort to ensure concrete research and science are used to protect human health and the environment. In May 2009, EPA restructured the IRIS program to reinforce independent review and ensure the timely publication of assessments. In July 2011, EPA announced further changes to strengthen the IRIS program in response to recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences. EPA’s peer review process is designed to elicit the strongest possible critique to ensure that each final IRIS assessment reflects sound, rigorous science.

    More information on IRIS: http://www.epa.gov/IRIS

    Monday, August 29, 2011

    Exposure Assessment Planning

    Ask the Expert Webinar Series
    September 15, 2011
    1:30 P.M. EST

    Exposure assessments are conducted for a variety of reasons. The design of the strategy should be consistent with the underlying purpose of the assessment and how the resulting data will be used. Collecting samples without fully understanding how the results will be utilized and communicated can result in obtaining information that maybe misinterpreted or misleading. Prior to collecting field samples, it is necessary to clearly understand the purpose and objectives of sampling projects.

    The purpose of the data collection, in conjunction with the availability and cost of field and laboratory analytic techniques, as well as the time sensitivity of the results, will determine the overall sampling strategy. This presentation provides a basic overview of the planning elements that are important to conducting a productive, cost effective and successful exposure assessment.


    Register Now for the presentation